farfrumpukn Posted November 17 Posted November 17 12 hours ago, Nicc said: For anyone who’s curious she releases November 21st This month. Then what is being released in the 19th? 1 Quote
Rachit Posted November 17 Posted November 17 48 minutes ago, farfrumpukn said: Then what is being released in the 19th? Do you think it could be Creeproductions? Membership release before the Amazon release? 2 Quote
miss_understood Posted November 17 Posted November 17 4 hours ago, Fangtastic CrysDoll said: Also to make everyone aware, Harris Reed is non-binary, so their pronouns are they/them. Sending lots of positive vibes to all for this release. 😘 Thanks a lot for pointing that out! I was wondering, but that's what I had found in an article from 2022 and why I used "he/him" (so now I'm a bit confused): "He describes his style as “Romanticism Gone Nonbinary” It particularly focuses on the person wearing his fashion. Reed particularly wants to use his work to fight for the recognition of gender fluidity. He describes himself as genderfluid: He feels defined neither by the concept of woman or man. He once used the pronoun “they/them,” but recently switched to “he/him.” His fashion breaks down the traditional division into men's and women's clothing and does not subordinate itself to traditional gender images or seasonal fashion." 2 5 Quote
Electrified Posted November 17 Posted November 17 This confused me when I saw the thumbnail because it looked like an Ever After High boy to me at first and I was like "holy crud, EAH collectors?" 😅 Anyways... so glad I am not interested. I don't really care for non-monstery dolls in MH unless they are tied to a horror or gothic story. And I am also getting tired of the Drag inspired stuff. It's something you can have in Barbie but for MH the creepy-cool aspect seems to be getting lost. Even reusing an older mold would have been cooler than just a human with fangs. While I am on my soap-box, I am also sick of this implication that "breaking gender norms" is all about fashion. Not a fan, sorry. But it's yet another doll that no one saw coming, is it? The leakers are getting a little unreliable 😉 6 Quote
Pgirl1986 Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I dunno. Fashion is expression. And Genderfluid people like Harris Reed have the right to express themselves. (Also how's this 'Drag Inspired'? It's more High Fashion then anything.) I think it looks alright. Fine. Perfectly serviceable. Not my cuppa tea. It doesn't help that Witch Weaver comes after Young-Hee, who was a complete knockout for me so, y'know. Tough act to follow. 2 1 Quote Just your average Monster High Enjoyer. Profile Pic by: https://sassmaster-artjay.tumblr.com/
hrussio Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I had never heard of this designer (I'm not a fashion brand kinda girl so it's always out of my knowledge zone), but I am pretty intrigued with this doll. My only critique is the eyes as it really gives barbie/myscene vibes to me. BUT overall the doll is gorgeous, so, I will be grabbing one. 8 Quote
hrussio Posted November 17 Posted November 17 3 hours ago, miss_understood said: Thanks a lot for pointing that out! I was wondering, but that's what I had found in an article from 2022 and why I used "he/him" (so now I'm a bit confused): "He describes his style as “Romanticism Gone Nonbinary” It particularly focuses on the person wearing his fashion. Reed particularly wants to use his work to fight for the recognition of gender fluidity. He describes himself as genderfluid: He feels defined neither by the concept of woman or man. He once used the pronoun “they/them,” but recently switched to “he/him.” His fashion breaks down the traditional division into men's and women's clothing and does not subordinate itself to traditional gender images or seasonal fashion." Yes, this is what I have read as well. 1 Quote
Miss Jaye Posted November 17 Posted November 17 (edited) 20 minutes ago, hrussio said: I had never heard of this designer (I'm not a fashion brand kinda girl so it's always out of my knowledge zone), but I am pretty intrigued with this doll. My only critique is the eyes as it really gives barbie/myscene vibes to me. BUT overall the doll is gorgeous, so, I will be grabbing one. I had not as well. I did read on his site that his fashion looks invites, "looks and stares". How cool. Good luck to you sis! 🙂 Edited November 17 by Miss Jaye 3 Quote
WoohooTime Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I'm just hoping the doll won't be as expensive as the off white dolls. I understand its still designer but i personally haven't heard of it and a lot of people have said the same so hopefully not? Its labelled as 2 dollar signs which means its not as expensive as the hocus pocus? Hopefully under 100 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 my credit is not lookin good rn... 1 Quote
ShanaRose Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I heard speculations/rumors it'd be $90? So prepare to spend about $100-$110 after taxes/shipping. 1 Quote 🏵️🍁🌸
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.